I know I went off on a form of a rant regarding the NFL players and how through their own words they're not helping their cause in the court of public opinion. This isn't a retraction or an extension of that.
This post differs from that. Greatly.
Let me ask you this. Are you really thinking of all these NFL players and owners right now? Seriously think about your answer here. I'm not in any way. If you're an NFL fan and only an NFL fan, you most likely are. You're fretting that with all the disdain, there is a chance there's no 2011 season or at the least, a loss of some games. What if you're not? What if you're just the "average sports fan"?
This won't hit you yet. Depending on your cup of tea for this time of the year, you have the NCAA men's and women's tourneys. You have spring training beginning to wind down and baseball's opening day a scant nine days away. The NHL is making its push for the playoffs. Matt Cooke won't be playing, though. Arnie's hosting his tournament at Bay Hill this week. Tiger and Phil are among those entered. The NBA is also making a playoff push and Derrick Rose has been fabulous so far this year. The MLS season has started and the leagues over in Europe are having their season ending pushes for avoiding relegation or making the Champions League or being promoted.
You see, it's not all about the NFL. There are other avenues to explore within the sports spectrum. I'm well aware the NFL is being touted as being at an all-time high. Is it now? It actually might be at an all-time low because of the labor strife. But you know something. Let those that could determine its fate do such.
We don't need an update every 15 freakin' minutes about the discord. About the disconnect. We don't need it from ESPN, FOX, CBS or any other outlet as far as that goes. Yes, blogs included.
It amazes me that some media feel we need to see a group of players seated ever so precisely being interviewed and condemning those that have given them the opportunity to make a lot of coin. It's disconcerting. Ever there was ever an instance of something appearing staged, that was it.
The owners aren't in the clear either. I understand they want more money in their pockets. I don't understand denying those that made you your little cache of bills from having a healthy life after their short careers. You say tomato, I say tomahto.
No, I'm not against the players. I'm not against the owners either. Bring up all the millionaires arguing with billionaires BS you want.
Point is, it's March. The NFL should be taking a back seat for now to all the other great sporting events we have. It's a shame the sports outlets won't enjoy those.
Showing posts with label nfl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nfl. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
NFL Players Not Helping Their Own Cause
Image via WikipediaThree recent stories/quotes have severely set wrong with me. Has it had an effect on view of the current lockout? No, but it has tilted my opinion. We all know the billionaire owners and millionaire players could not reach an ends for a new collective bargaining agreement. After I read these three stories, I'm slowly inchin the way of the billionaires. I know. They don't need the cash.
Hard to imagine that anyone in their right mind could find any fault with New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees. After the Saints won their Super Bowl, Brees transformed into a media darling. He did the whole tour associated with being the winning QB. It carried over into this past season. But something Brees said, while it may be completely true, gave me the impression (and it's my impression) that he's sounding a little sour. Jarrett Bell of USA Today quotes Brees on the state of the owners side.
"A lot of it, I think, was all a front," said Brees, "all a show, with no real intent to get a deal done, except to say they made a proposal."Before I delve into that, I also want to bring to light a quote from Indianapolis Colts center Jeff Saturday. Bell, once again...
"The first four days (last week) we're sitting there, not getting anything done," said Saturday, who participated in the bulk of the sessions overseen by a federal mediator over three weeks. "It seems odd that you'd wait until Friday, as you're getting closer to lunch, to put out a 20-point proposal, when each point has a number of different details in it. There's just no way. It's like trying to throw an enormous amount of information on someone, right before a deadline, to push something through."While Brees is most likely dead on with his statement, why air that? Would anyone think the owners could be capable of such? I do. It's really not a shocker. It just comes off as sounding bitter. And Saturday is probably right as well. The owners probably were going with the "information overload" approach. It was a bit crafty, but the players saw through that.
It doesn't matter whose side you're gravitating toward, downgrading the other side nowadays doesn't carry the weight it once did. But one method you may have at your disposal is the infamous "bullying tactic". I bring that up because it appears the NFLPA may have been attempting just that.
The Gridiron Grind on Technorati explored a report (one that was later disputed) that the NFLPA has requested for top prospects to boycott next month's draft. The report also states the NFLPA was requesting that these prospects not only decline the NFL's inviation, but choose to attend their own little gig.
NFLPA exec George Atallah addresses this.
"It would be the same but instead of walking across the stage and shaking hands or getting a man hug from a commissioner who of course has locked you out and is insisting on a wage scale, you'd be walking across the stage and maybe get a handshake from [NFLPA executive director] DeMaurice Smith, who of course is fighting for you not to have a wage scale and not to lock you out."Sure. Another case of making you look good and the other looking like the Evil Empire.
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
Mel on Cam
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeNot surprising considering Newton has lately become the greatest thing since sliced bread or so some think. Kiper is NOT one of those. Courtesy of Joe Reedy of Cincinnati.com, Kiper feels Newton is a risk.
“If you hit on Newton you could have a sensational quarterback for 10 years. If you miss, it sets you back three, four, five years,” Kiper said. “He was a one-year wonder. Akili Smith was a one-year wonder.”Now, all Bengals fans remember Akili Smith, don't they? That pick did set the franchise back a bit. The interesting point is that in Kiper's most recent mock draft, guess who he has taking Newton? That's right. The Cincinnati Bengals at #4. Not WR A.J Green from Georgia as he had slotted previously, but Auburn's Newton.
And the one-year wonder tag does make sense...somewhat. He did have the one year at Florida (sort of) followed by the year at Blinn College where led then to a JUCO title. JUCO and the SEC are two completely different animals and Newton did master them both. I'm personally not that high on Newton either. In fact, this QB class is weak.
But Kiper has an interesting theory as to why Cincy will go that way.
“In 2003, Marvin Lewis’ first year as head coach with the Bengals, the franchise drafted Carson Palmer, and had the discipline to start Jon Kitna all season and let Palmer learn the system while waiting to step in as the franchise quarterback. With Palmer on his way out, Lewis could do something similar in 2011, drafting Newton, letting him take a year to learn the system and plugging in an interim solution in the meantime. The Bengals could also consider moving this pick, similar to Carolina’s position with Gabbert.”I said it was interesting. I didn't say it was plausible. There are some things here.
Sunday, February 06, 2011
Super Bowl XLV: Yet Another Prediction...and other Stories
Leading up to the big game, there have been five prevailing storylines emerge.
1. The weather.
Hard to believe that it's been so atrocious down in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. People injured from ice falling off the top of the stadium. Airports temporarily shutdown due to ice on the runways. It's made travel an extreme headache. And those that have hosted radio and/or TV spots during the time there have experienced the adverse conditions.
I'd still rather be there in the cold than not at all.
Image by Getty Images via @daylife2. The saga of a team picture.
The Green Bay Packers were scheduled to have their team picture taken on Tuesday of this past week, media day. The issue became those players that were on IR for Green Bay would not be arriving until Thursday. Some Packers players voiced their frustration over the matter via Twitter (doesn't everybody these days?).
Packers captains Charles Woodson and Aaron Rodgers addressed the matter with head coach Mike McCarthy. The Packers had the taking of the pic moved to Friday to include those players.
But the issue wasn't so quickly over. Someone asked Rodgers of his take (via NFL.com):
3. Ben and the piano bar.
Much was made when a TMZ report surfaced that Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger and some of his teammates went out to dinner and then made way to a piano bar. The report also stated that Big Ben missed the midnight curfew. That was quickly blown off by Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin (via Boston Herald):
Image by Getty Images via @daylife4. Maurkice Pouncey.
Pouncey was ruled out for playing today due to a high left ankle sprain he suffered against the New York Jets in the AFC Championship. Ponucey was placed on IR and will not even be available for the game. So who would step in to replace the rookie Pro Bowler?
Signs were pointing to Doug Legursky, the same who replaced Pouncey in the Jets game. But I heard an interesting take on this just a couple of hours ago.
Trevor Pryce was on ESPN's First Take and was asked about Legursky and the potential of issues with Packer NT B.J. Raji. Pryce thought that Legursky might not even be the guy to snap the ball. He suggested that since there were two weeks to prepare, the Steelers could move a guard to play center. If that's the case, Legursky would be playing guard, his natural position.
5. Aaron Rodgers.
Has nothing to do with his take on the team pic. He's the hottest commodity in the NFL right now. He has earned it. If the Packers can win today, Brett Favre, still revered by some within the Packers fanbase, will become a smaller dot in the rear view mirror.
So...on with my outlook and prediction for the game.
1. The weather.
Hard to believe that it's been so atrocious down in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. People injured from ice falling off the top of the stadium. Airports temporarily shutdown due to ice on the runways. It's made travel an extreme headache. And those that have hosted radio and/or TV spots during the time there have experienced the adverse conditions.
I'd still rather be there in the cold than not at all.
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeThe Green Bay Packers were scheduled to have their team picture taken on Tuesday of this past week, media day. The issue became those players that were on IR for Green Bay would not be arriving until Thursday. Some Packers players voiced their frustration over the matter via Twitter (doesn't everybody these days?).
Packers captains Charles Woodson and Aaron Rodgers addressed the matter with head coach Mike McCarthy. The Packers had the taking of the pic moved to Friday to include those players.
But the issue wasn't so quickly over. Someone asked Rodgers of his take (via NFL.com):
"I'll say this, I was on IR back in 2006 and I chose to stick around and finish out the season with my guys and be here every game. Some of those guys didn't," Rodgers said. "Some of the guys who were injured, they still are part of this team, but they didn't choose to stick around."And he's right. It's like the family member that you really won't want to be in the family pic, but you give in because he/she "is family".
3. Ben and the piano bar.
Much was made when a TMZ report surfaced that Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger and some of his teammates went out to dinner and then made way to a piano bar. The report also stated that Big Ben missed the midnight curfew. That was quickly blown off by Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin (via Boston Herald):
“I am not concerned about that one iota,” Tomlin said when asked about the TMZ report. “It’s normal for guys to eat dinner, believe it or not, every now and then during the course of the week leading up to a game. So, this week is no different than any other.Case closed. Of course, there are those thast suggested that Roethlisberger not even go out due to his off-field occurrences. That's a load of crap. As Tomlin said, they have lives.
“I understand that some things may be reported and viewed differently, but that’s not our concern, really. During the course of the season on a Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday, or what have you, believe it or not, guys live lives.”
Image by Getty Images via @daylifePouncey was ruled out for playing today due to a high left ankle sprain he suffered against the New York Jets in the AFC Championship. Ponucey was placed on IR and will not even be available for the game. So who would step in to replace the rookie Pro Bowler?
Signs were pointing to Doug Legursky, the same who replaced Pouncey in the Jets game. But I heard an interesting take on this just a couple of hours ago.
Trevor Pryce was on ESPN's First Take and was asked about Legursky and the potential of issues with Packer NT B.J. Raji. Pryce thought that Legursky might not even be the guy to snap the ball. He suggested that since there were two weeks to prepare, the Steelers could move a guard to play center. If that's the case, Legursky would be playing guard, his natural position.
5. Aaron Rodgers.
Has nothing to do with his take on the team pic. He's the hottest commodity in the NFL right now. He has earned it. If the Packers can win today, Brett Favre, still revered by some within the Packers fanbase, will become a smaller dot in the rear view mirror.
So...on with my outlook and prediction for the game.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Cutler Attacks Brings About Much
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeOn a hit, it appeared that Cutler's right knee was twisted in a weird manner. A noticeable limp was seen as Cutler came off the field and he even left the field before the first half was over. He attempted to give it a go in the second half, but was unable to do such. An MRI is scheduled for today.
Cutler's toughness is being brought into question. Current and former NFL players are among those. One network has taken to task of displaying the players tweets about Cutler. Bears fans are burning his jersey. One post I read is stating Cutler's legacy is tarnished. I'll address these in order as I listed them.
I completely understand former (and most likely current) NFL players being quick to beat down Cutler. They have played. They know. Remember Philip Rivers and playing the 2007 AFC Championship in New England with a torn knee ligament? That's why.
What I don't get about is players and former players taking to Twitter to take another shot at Cutler. Really? Maurice Jones-Drew, Raheem Brock and ESPN's Mark Schlereth joining in the parade.
ESPN is even scrolling these and other negative Cutler referenced tweets on the bottom of the screen. I really don't get that. That is poor judgment by a network at its best. Oh, it's ESPN. Can't say I'm shocked they'd pull that move. They hired Colin Cowherd for cryin' out loud.
But all of you are showing a complete lack of class. Why make that public, especially players. I'll again reference the 2007 AFC Championship game where Rivers played with torn ligaments. Why am I going back to that? There was another Charger that did not play in that game due to injury...LaDainian Tomlinson. LT had bruised his knee the previous week against the Indianapolis Colts and missed the second half of that game. How quickly people forget.
And what the hell will burning his jersey do? It's even not close to when LeBron left Cleveland and the fans were pissed and resorted to a similar act. Cutler didn't pull of a self-promotion to make an announcement. LeBron bolted Cleveland.
And when did Cutler ever develop a legacy? You can't tarnish what you don't have. The only "legacy" Cutler has is how he departed from Denver. Nothing more. I get the venom for Schlereth on that. He's a Bronco through and through. To say Cutler has a legacy is a little absurd.
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeHe was asked about Cutler's injury and his teammates toughness. Urlacher responded (ESPNChicago.com):
"Jay was hurt," Urlacher said. "I don't question his toughness. He's tough as hell. He's one of the toughest guys on our football team. He doesn't bitch. He doesn't complain when he gets hit. He goes out there and plays his ass off every Sunday. He practices every single day. So, no, we don't question his toughness."Urlacher was then told of current NFL players jumping on the bashing of Cutler.
"Nothing like jealous people who are sitting home watching," Urlacher said. "Players around the league you said, right? Yeah, love jealous people when they're watching our game on TV while their season is over."And he didn't stop there. Urlacher responded during an interview on FOX. When he was told about the fans reaction..
"Who cares what they think?" he said. "That's my response to them. They are not playing in this game. Jay was hurt, obviously. There's no reason for him to be out there if he can't get it done. He was obviously hurt pretty bad or he would have played. For them to question his toughness is stupid to me."I'm waiting for someone to say Urlacher was merely blowing smoke. I feel sorry for that individual.
And the support for Cutler does not end there. Bears center Olin Kreutz put his two cents in on the matter.
"I didn't think he was going to even finish the half," Kreutz said. "Then when he came out and tried it again, that amazed me."And it amazes me that anyone not privy to the information regarding Cutler's injury and not privy to the Bears staff and its possible decision to sit the QB are being so quick to judge. They see Cutler on the sideline and immediately think he can go.
Things aren't always as they seem.
According to Sean Jensen of the Chicago Sun-Times, Cutler did suffer a tear of the MCL. The degree is not currently know.
But the bashing continues. NFL Network's Deion Sanders tweets he "better see dr andrews operate live on Cutler".
Should anyone expect different from "Neon Deion"? I do miss him on CBS pregame.
Again, so quick to judge.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Sources: Palmer Wants out of Cincinnati...or Retire
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIt's apparent why Palmer wants out. Mort provides the answer.
"Palmer has become the object of fan frustration in the past two years and sources said he has grown frustrated with the team's inconsistencies."Here's the numbers for Palmer since being tabbed as the Bengals starting QB.
| Year | G | GS | QBrec | Cmp | Att | Yds | TD | Int | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 13 | 13 | 6-7-0 | 263 | 432 | 60.9 | 2897 | 18 | 18 | 77.3 |
| 2005* | 16 | 16 | 11-5-0 | 345 | 509 | 67.8 | 3836 | 32 | 12 | 101.1 |
| 2006* | 16 | 16 | 8-8-0 | 324 | 520 | 62.3 | 4035 | 28 | 13 | 93.9 |
| 2007 | 16 | 16 | 7-9-0 | 373 | 575 | 64.9 | 4131 | 26 | 20 | 86.7 |
| 2008 | 4 | 4 | 0-4-0 | 75 | 129 | 58.1 | 731 | 3 | 4 | 69.0 |
| 2009 | 16 | 16 | 10-6-0 | 282 | 466 | 60.5 | 3094 | 21 | 13 | 83.6 |
| 2010 | 16 | 16 | 362 | 586 | 61.8 | 3970 | 26 | 20 | 82.4 | |
| Career | 97 | 97 | 42-39-0 | 2024 | 3217 | 62.9 | 22694 | 154 | 100 | 86.9 |
After a fantastic 2005 season, Palmer's second in the NFL as a player (he sat his entire first season as he learned the ropes), Palmer's production has been in a steady decline. The numbers completely bear that point.
I can see why. Mort's sources state that Palmer is "frustrated". Over the past two years (at least) there's a reason Palmer may be frustrated. The Bengals have no offensive identity. The philosophy seems to change on impulse. In 2009, Cincy was primarily a running team with Cedric Benson carting the load. The Bengals were 10-6 and won the AFC North.
This past season, the Bengals snared Terrell Owens via free agency and drafted Jermaine Gresham and Jordan Shipley. Maybe the Bengals would evolve into a passing team. It never materialized and the Bengals finished 4-12. Since that magical 2005 season, Palmer's passer rating has declined in seasons where he was the full-time QB. The crowd at PBS has also shown its disdain over Palmer and his bad decisions and lack of accuracy.
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeHere's what makes me laugh about this. If the sources are correct, Palmer is saying "deal me or I quit".
Yeah, I want that guy running my offense.
Update: Just about a half an hour ago, Joe Reedy of the Cincinnati Enquirer posted on his blog that the Bengals are currently not entertaining any offers for Palmer. Bengals team president Mike Brown did confirm that Palmer requested a trade.
Update #2: Palmer's agent, David Dunn, released a statement on the affairs between Palmer and the Bengals. Again, Reedy has this posted.
“Carson met with Bengals owner Mike Brown recently. They both expressed profound disappointment in how the team fared last season, and in how it has generally performed during Carson’s tenure with the team. Because of the lack of success that Carson and the Bengals have experienced together, Carson strongly feels that a separation between him and the Bengals would be in the best interest of both parties. Carson could not respect the Brown family any more than he does or be more appreciative of what the Browns have done for him and his wife Shaelyn and his family.”You can consider this a bit of fluff. All the rights things were said, er, written. There isn't exactly the phrase "requested to be traded" in there, but "separation" was. Maybe it is time for Palmer to go elsewhere. He obviously doesn't want to be in Cincinnati any longer.
Monday, January 17, 2011
The Day After: Seahawks/Bears and Jets/Pats
Not a whole lot to say about the Bears/Seahawks tilt. It was pretty much done when Seattle fell behind 21-0 at the 10:01 mark of the second quarter after a Jay Cutler TD run.
Wait. There is.
The Bears will not receive the kudos they deserve because they beat a team with a losing record. For the entire season, the Seahawks finished 8-10. Doesn't matter that they gained 437 total yards. It was against a poor defense. Doesn't matter that the allowed less than 300 yards of offense to Seattle. It was against a poor offense.
See what I mean. I can go on, too. After the Bears jumped out to that 21-0 lead, the Seahawks outscored them 24-14 the remainder of the game. The last two TD Seattle scored were within the last 2:16 of the game.
In other words, the game wasn't near as close as the final would indicate. The Bears were up 35-10 with just a little over two minutes remaining. And do not attempt to say that the Seahawks made it respectable.
The Bears defense stifled the Seahawks running game and made the Seahawks one dimensional. And while Matthew Hasselbeck's numbers won't blow you away, he did play a good game. Cutler was just better. The Bears defense was better. Give them their due.
As far as the Jets/Pats, I was shocked. That's an understatement. I thought that when the war of words was launched, the would serve poorly for the Jets. Yes, I was wrong. The Jets backed up their brash behavior with a 28-21 win.
Wait. There is.
The Bears will not receive the kudos they deserve because they beat a team with a losing record. For the entire season, the Seahawks finished 8-10. Doesn't matter that they gained 437 total yards. It was against a poor defense. Doesn't matter that the allowed less than 300 yards of offense to Seattle. It was against a poor offense.
See what I mean. I can go on, too. After the Bears jumped out to that 21-0 lead, the Seahawks outscored them 24-14 the remainder of the game. The last two TD Seattle scored were within the last 2:16 of the game.
In other words, the game wasn't near as close as the final would indicate. The Bears were up 35-10 with just a little over two minutes remaining. And do not attempt to say that the Seahawks made it respectable.
The Bears defense stifled the Seahawks running game and made the Seahawks one dimensional. And while Matthew Hasselbeck's numbers won't blow you away, he did play a good game. Cutler was just better. The Bears defense was better. Give them their due.
As far as the Jets/Pats, I was shocked. That's an understatement. I thought that when the war of words was launched, the would serve poorly for the Jets. Yes, I was wrong. The Jets backed up their brash behavior with a 28-21 win.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
NFC Divisional Wrapup: Packers/Falcons
Going into Saturday night's clash between the Green Bay Packers and Atlanta Falcons, there was one thing that nobody could deny. Packers QB Aaron Rodgers is pretty darn good. After the game, that changed. Rodgers is pretty darn awesome.
While no one has ever really doubted Rodgers and his talent, the Atlanta Falcons defense could find no answer for him. They could barely provide any pressure. When they did, Rodgers, whose foot speed is underrated, found the means still make a play for positive yardage. WHen the smoke cleared, Rodgers was 31-36 for 366 yards and 3 TD. And don't forget to add his rush TD either.
The Pack didn't need the newly discovered running attack either although they did manage to rush for 96 yards. Rodgers was the story...and the show.
The defense provided a score as well. CB Truman Williams picked off an ill-advised Matt Ryan pass and sprinted 70 yards for the score. Bad timing, too. Atlanta was driving for a potential field goal when Ryan released the pass. All the Falcons were trying to do was get a little closer for K Matt Bryant to attempt that field goal. It never happened. The Falcons never recovered from the half ending score.
Yes, the turnover bug had the Falcons solely in its sights. Four times the Falcons gave the ball to Green Bay. Twice on picks by Williams (one in the endzone) and twice the Falcons put the ball on the turf. Hard to win with a -3 turnover ratio for a game.
I felt going into this game that the Falcons were getting no respect. They were the NFC's #1 seed, but it seemed they were under the radar.
They're still there and haven't been found.
While no one has ever really doubted Rodgers and his talent, the Atlanta Falcons defense could find no answer for him. They could barely provide any pressure. When they did, Rodgers, whose foot speed is underrated, found the means still make a play for positive yardage. WHen the smoke cleared, Rodgers was 31-36 for 366 yards and 3 TD. And don't forget to add his rush TD either.
The Pack didn't need the newly discovered running attack either although they did manage to rush for 96 yards. Rodgers was the story...and the show.
The defense provided a score as well. CB Truman Williams picked off an ill-advised Matt Ryan pass and sprinted 70 yards for the score. Bad timing, too. Atlanta was driving for a potential field goal when Ryan released the pass. All the Falcons were trying to do was get a little closer for K Matt Bryant to attempt that field goal. It never happened. The Falcons never recovered from the half ending score.
Yes, the turnover bug had the Falcons solely in its sights. Four times the Falcons gave the ball to Green Bay. Twice on picks by Williams (one in the endzone) and twice the Falcons put the ball on the turf. Hard to win with a -3 turnover ratio for a game.
I felt going into this game that the Falcons were getting no respect. They were the NFC's #1 seed, but it seemed they were under the radar.
They're still there and haven't been found.
NFL Divisional Wrapup - Steelers/Ravens
The first game of Saturday had all the makings of defensive struggle. Steelers and Ravens, what more could be expected, right?
Well, it was that despite the final score of 31-24 with the Steelers advancing. The Steelers overcame a 21-7 halftime deficit to gain a nod in the AFC Championship game.
The defensive struggle part? It really was. The two teams combined for 389 yards of total offense. The problem was on the Ravens side, offensively. They could only muster 126 yards of offense. And don't forget the five total turnovers as well. All led to points.
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeThe game's first turnover came on a bit of a bizarre set of circumstances. Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger was being rushed and was hit from behind by Ravens DE Terrell Suggs. The ball hit the ground and evey stopped playing...except DE Cory Redding. Redding scooped up the ball and ran into the endzone. Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin challenged the play and was unsuccessful. That left Pittsburgh with no more challenges remaining as Tomlin had already used his first earlier in the quarter.
The second Steelers turnover came at the 10:32 mark of the second quarter. RB Rashard Mendenhall was going into a scrum of linemen when his own teammate, OL Chris Kemoeatu, knocked the ball loose from Mendenhall's arm. On the sixth play following the fumble recovery, the Ravens scored a TD. Ravens 21, Steelers 7. The Ravens converted two turnovers into 14 points.
After halftime, it was time for the tide to turn in the Steelers favor.
Well, it was that despite the final score of 31-24 with the Steelers advancing. The Steelers overcame a 21-7 halftime deficit to gain a nod in the AFC Championship game.
The defensive struggle part? It really was. The two teams combined for 389 yards of total offense. The problem was on the Ravens side, offensively. They could only muster 126 yards of offense. And don't forget the five total turnovers as well. All led to points.
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeThe second Steelers turnover came at the 10:32 mark of the second quarter. RB Rashard Mendenhall was going into a scrum of linemen when his own teammate, OL Chris Kemoeatu, knocked the ball loose from Mendenhall's arm. On the sixth play following the fumble recovery, the Ravens scored a TD. Ravens 21, Steelers 7. The Ravens converted two turnovers into 14 points.
After halftime, it was time for the tide to turn in the Steelers favor.
AFC Divisional Clash: Jets/Patriots
Trash talking. It's part of the modus operandi of the New York Jets, specifically head coach Rex Ryan. Well, I believe the Jets and the Boisterous One may have made a critical mistake. You know you may me talking too much when Reggie Jackson tells you to shut up.
Image via WikipediaYet, the venom continues to spew. Antonio Cromartie, Bart Scott and Ryan have all called attention to themselves and their team. Ryan says it's personal. Cromatie called Brady an ahole. Scott says Welker's days in a uniform are numbered. All I ask is that these guys that crow back it up. And even then, it will be the same should they prevail in this contest.
And the Patriots, for the most part, just watch it flow. That's how they operate off the field.
The hottest of NFL rivalries (I said hottest, not best) takes center stage in Sunday's late game.
Game Time: 4:30 PM ET
Network: CBS
Announcers: Jim Nantz and Phil Simms
When the Patriots have the ball...
The most likely NFL MVP, QB Tom Brady, performed about as well as you could considering a couple of circumstances.
One was the unknown associated with WR Wes Welker's return for destroying his knee in 2009's final regular season game. That question was loudly answered with Welker being second in the league in receptions with 112.
The second was the trading of his only legitimate deep threat in WR Randy Moss. Well, Moss floundered and was released by Minnesota, reappeared with the Titans and pretty much disappeared.
Enter WR Deion Branch, former Super Bowl hero. It was like he never left. But the biggest surprise/addition was the of RB Danny Woodhead, a Jets reject. Woodhead, achieving cult hero status in the Boston area, has been the straw that stirs the drink. He can run and he can catch. Tell me how he ends up in New England? Easy. The kid's coachable.
The Pats even have a power running game with BenJarvis Green-Ellis. He eclipsed the 1,00 yard mark this year with 1,008 yards.
And don't forget the numerous targets at tight end in rookies Ron Gronkowski and Aaron Hernanadez. A pretty potent offense. They usually score early and score often. They do not commit turnovers. How do you defend all that?
Jets head coach Rex Ryan will face the Pats for the third time this season. The first game, the Jets overcame a halftime deficit and defeated the Patriots 28-14. The second game was a disaster. A 45-3 loss at Gillette Stadium, the site for this game.
The defense is the Jets calling card. As is usually the case, the pressure may fall right on the backs of the Jets defense. While we all know of the talents of CB Darelle Revis, teams have taken to task of picking on CB Antonio Cromartie. Teams have been successful with that approach. And Cromatie must not only shut his yap, he must shut down the Pats receivers.
But that may be asking too much. The Jets D line must produce massive pressure on Brady. If not, another long game will ensue. And it could get out of hand as quick as the last time these teams met.
When the Jets have the ball...
For the last two postseasons, QB Mark Sanchez has shown a bit of maturity. While he didn't dazzle in any of the three playoff games in which he has played, he has managed to show the world that he can play the position. The drive he led last week that led the a game winning field by Nick Folk proved to me that he has moxie.
Now, the rest of the offense must follow. We know that the Jets will run the ball and run it some more. Just like the defense, the running game and Jets are hand in hand. RBs Shonn Greene and LaDainian Tomlinson must have the exact type of games they had against the Colts. Keep the Pats offense of the field.
The Jets do have other weapons in WRs Braylon Edwards, Santonio Holes and TE Dustin Keller. But the best weapon, WR/KR Brad Smith, may not be available. Smith runs the Wildcat, returns kicks and lines up at receiver. He could be the Jets MVP that's how valuable SMith is to the entire Jets gameplan.
The saving grace may be that the Patriots aren't exactly a smothering defense. They're not your prototypical championship defense. But they get the job done. They keep you out of the endzone. The Pats defense yielded over 366 yards a game, ranking 25th. But they only allowed 19.6 points per contest, good for 8th overall. Another bend, but don't break defense.
In other words, you can move the ball on them, but your chances of putting the ball in the endzone are not great.
But the best aspect of the Patriots defense may be their ability to force turnovers. That's really an understatement. The Pats were a +28 in turnover margin, best in the league. They forced 38 turnovers. Only that week 2 game in the new Meadowlands accounted for the only game in which New England's defense did NOT force a turnover. They forced three in the rematch.
Sound familiar? Isn't that how the Saints operated last season? Explosive offense. Opportunistic defense.
I'm not giving the Lombardi to the Pats yet. I'm just sayin'.
Image via WikipediaAnd the Patriots, for the most part, just watch it flow. That's how they operate off the field.
The hottest of NFL rivalries (I said hottest, not best) takes center stage in Sunday's late game.
Game Time: 4:30 PM ET
Network: CBS
Announcers: Jim Nantz and Phil Simms
When the Patriots have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 32.4 (1st) | 363.8 (8th) | 240.4 (11th) | 123.3 (9th) |
 | 19.0 (6th) | 291.5 (3rd) | 200.6 (6th) | 90.9 (3rd) |
The most likely NFL MVP, QB Tom Brady, performed about as well as you could considering a couple of circumstances.
One was the unknown associated with WR Wes Welker's return for destroying his knee in 2009's final regular season game. That question was loudly answered with Welker being second in the league in receptions with 112.
 |
| No player had a better 2010 season than Brady. (Image by americanistadechiapas via Flickr) |
Enter WR Deion Branch, former Super Bowl hero. It was like he never left. But the biggest surprise/addition was the of RB Danny Woodhead, a Jets reject. Woodhead, achieving cult hero status in the Boston area, has been the straw that stirs the drink. He can run and he can catch. Tell me how he ends up in New England? Easy. The kid's coachable.
The Pats even have a power running game with BenJarvis Green-Ellis. He eclipsed the 1,00 yard mark this year with 1,008 yards.
And don't forget the numerous targets at tight end in rookies Ron Gronkowski and Aaron Hernanadez. A pretty potent offense. They usually score early and score often. They do not commit turnovers. How do you defend all that?
Jets head coach Rex Ryan will face the Pats for the third time this season. The first game, the Jets overcame a halftime deficit and defeated the Patriots 28-14. The second game was a disaster. A 45-3 loss at Gillette Stadium, the site for this game.
The defense is the Jets calling card. As is usually the case, the pressure may fall right on the backs of the Jets defense. While we all know of the talents of CB Darelle Revis, teams have taken to task of picking on CB Antonio Cromartie. Teams have been successful with that approach. And Cromatie must not only shut his yap, he must shut down the Pats receivers.
But that may be asking too much. The Jets D line must produce massive pressure on Brady. If not, another long game will ensue. And it could get out of hand as quick as the last time these teams met.
When the Jets have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.9 (13th) | 351.0 (11th) | 202.6 (22nd) | 148.4 (4th) |
| 19.6 (8th) | 366.5 (25th) | 258.5 (30th) | 108.0 (11th) |
For the last two postseasons, QB Mark Sanchez has shown a bit of maturity. While he didn't dazzle in any of the three playoff games in which he has played, he has managed to show the world that he can play the position. The drive he led last week that led the a game winning field by Nick Folk proved to me that he has moxie.
 |
| Sanchez will be key for the Jets. (Image by Seamus Murray via Flickr) |
The Jets do have other weapons in WRs Braylon Edwards, Santonio Holes and TE Dustin Keller. But the best weapon, WR/KR Brad Smith, may not be available. Smith runs the Wildcat, returns kicks and lines up at receiver. He could be the Jets MVP that's how valuable SMith is to the entire Jets gameplan.
The saving grace may be that the Patriots aren't exactly a smothering defense. They're not your prototypical championship defense. But they get the job done. They keep you out of the endzone. The Pats defense yielded over 366 yards a game, ranking 25th. But they only allowed 19.6 points per contest, good for 8th overall. Another bend, but don't break defense.
In other words, you can move the ball on them, but your chances of putting the ball in the endzone are not great.
But the best aspect of the Patriots defense may be their ability to force turnovers. That's really an understatement. The Pats were a +28 in turnover margin, best in the league. They forced 38 turnovers. Only that week 2 game in the new Meadowlands accounted for the only game in which New England's defense did NOT force a turnover. They forced three in the rematch.
Sound familiar? Isn't that how the Saints operated last season? Explosive offense. Opportunistic defense.
I'm not giving the Lombardi to the Pats yet. I'm just sayin'.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
NFC Divisional Game: Seahawks/Bears
The Chicago Bears have a chance for accomplish two things in this game. One is to avenge a 23-20 loss at the hands of Seattle earlier this season. Second, and I'm not so sure this can be done, is silence some of their critics.
I say that last part because the Bears are hosting an 8-9 team. You could conceivably say that Chicago is in a no-win situation there. Still, a win in the playoffs means you play another week.
Game Time: 1:00 PM ET
Network: FOX
Announcers: Kenny Albert, Daryl Johnston and Tony Siragusa
When the Bears have the ball...
One of the most frustrating things for Bears fans this past season was trying to determine what type of offense the Bears had? Mike Martz was brought in to upgrade the offense, but that didn't appear to be the case at the beginning even though the Bears were winning. QB Jay Cutler was getting pounded and the O line was porous at best.
Then a switch went was flipped. Martz changed up a few things. He changed protection schemes. He changed Cutler's drops and reads. He involved RB Matt Forte more. Both have made Cutler a better QB. Those games where Cutler reverts to just slinging the ball have diminished.
And when Forte was integrated more in the offense, it become more formidable. Forte's 2009 was near the season he had in 2008 when Forte was the Bears offense. In 2009, defenses keyed on him and he was stifled. The second half of 2010 looked more like the Forte of '08.
But don't think the Bears are just about Cutler and Forte. WRs Johnny Knox and Devin Hester (yes, he is still learning AND improving) come along just like the rest of the offensive unit. And even though TE Greg Olsen has yet to live up to his status as a first round pick, he's become a fave of Cutler.
The bad news for the Seahawks defense isn't that it's not a good unit. It's that their best player, LB Lofa Tatupu, may not be available after suffering a concussion against the Saints. Today will be the day to determine if he's a go. If he can't that leaves a major hole in an already bad defense.
So how did Seattle beat New Orleans last week? The Saints had seven trips in the red zone. They scored four TDs. That's how. I thought turnovers would play a vital role, but they didn't. The turnover battle was even. The Seahawks may have to improve on that this week. The Bears can run the ball where the Saints had issues all season with the rushing attack.
There could be a saving grace here...will the "old" Jay Cutler return? If it does, the Seahawks defense could feat on picks.
When the Seahawks have the ball...
Last week, RB Marshawn Lynch pulled off one of the greatest runs in playoff history to more or less seal the deal. QB Matthew Hasselbeck had perhaps his best game of the season. It seemed that he rarely missed. When he did, the guy was covered and he was throwing it away.
Hasselbeck will be key if the Seahawks are to pull another upset. He has to have the same game tomorrow he had last week. In fact, the whole Seahawks offense must duplicate their efforts in order to win. But can they do such?
Yes, Lynch must pound the ball between the tackles. Yes, Hasselbeck must be around 70% for his completions. Yes, John Carlson must be a factor. Yes, the O line must protect the aging QB. Yes, Mike Williams cannot drop balls. All are musts for Seattle to win.
There will be one difference in this game, LB Lance Briggs. He didn't play the first time. He will be comping at the bit for this go around. And it's an experienced trio at linebacker, Briggs, Brian Urlacher and Pino Tinoisamoa is as good a trio you will find.
Where the Bears upgraded, obviously, was bringing in DE Julius Peppers. And as much as you might think that helped the pass rush, it has helped stopping the run. The Bears were only behind the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2010. That's improvement.
The secondary is a bit underrated. They're aren't a lot of names back there, but they can hang with these Seahawks receivers. In fact, I like CB Charles Tillman. Look for Tillman to be manned up against Mike Williams.
Something that's interesting is that Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll said he will punt to Devin Hester. I don't get that. Seattle has a good punter in Jon Ryan. He was one of the top placement punters in the NFL this season. And why put the kind of unnecessary pressure on your coverage teams?
And maybe Carroll is just blowing smoke.
The issue in this game will be can Seattle outscore Chicago. I'm not seeing it, but they did outscore the Saints last week and New Orleans does have a more potent offense that Chicago. But as I said, the Bears can run. If Jay Cutler has 60 pass attempts like Drew Brees did last week, it WILL be a Seahawks victory.
I say that last part because the Bears are hosting an 8-9 team. You could conceivably say that Chicago is in a no-win situation there. Still, a win in the playoffs means you play another week.
Game Time: 1:00 PM ET
Network: FOX
Announcers: Kenny Albert, Daryl Johnston and Tony Siragusa
When the Bears have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 20.9 (21st) | 289.4 (30th) | 188.4 (28th) | 101.0 (22nd) |
 | 25.4 (25th) | 368.6 (27th) | 249.6 (27th) | 118.9 (21st) |
One of the most frustrating things for Bears fans this past season was trying to determine what type of offense the Bears had? Mike Martz was brought in to upgrade the offense, but that didn't appear to be the case at the beginning even though the Bears were winning. QB Jay Cutler was getting pounded and the O line was porous at best.
Then a switch went was flipped. Martz changed up a few things. He changed protection schemes. He changed Cutler's drops and reads. He involved RB Matt Forte more. Both have made Cutler a better QB. Those games where Cutler reverts to just slinging the ball have diminished.
 |
| (Image: Monica's Dad via Flickr |
But don't think the Bears are just about Cutler and Forte. WRs Johnny Knox and Devin Hester (yes, he is still learning AND improving) come along just like the rest of the offensive unit. And even though TE Greg Olsen has yet to live up to his status as a first round pick, he's become a fave of Cutler.
The bad news for the Seahawks defense isn't that it's not a good unit. It's that their best player, LB Lofa Tatupu, may not be available after suffering a concussion against the Saints. Today will be the day to determine if he's a go. If he can't that leaves a major hole in an already bad defense.
So how did Seattle beat New Orleans last week? The Saints had seven trips in the red zone. They scored four TDs. That's how. I thought turnovers would play a vital role, but they didn't. The turnover battle was even. The Seahawks may have to improve on that this week. The Bears can run the ball where the Saints had issues all season with the rushing attack.
There could be a saving grace here...will the "old" Jay Cutler return? If it does, the Seahawks defense could feat on picks.
When the Seahawks have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.4 (23rd) | 297.8 (28th) | 208.8 (19th) | 89.0 (31st) |
| 17.9 (4th) | 314.3 (9th) | 224.2 (20th) | 90.1 (2nd) |
Last week, RB Marshawn Lynch pulled off one of the greatest runs in playoff history to more or less seal the deal. QB Matthew Hasselbeck had perhaps his best game of the season. It seemed that he rarely missed. When he did, the guy was covered and he was throwing it away.
 |
| Hasselbeck must be protected (Image Matt McGee via Flickr) |
Yes, Lynch must pound the ball between the tackles. Yes, Hasselbeck must be around 70% for his completions. Yes, John Carlson must be a factor. Yes, the O line must protect the aging QB. Yes, Mike Williams cannot drop balls. All are musts for Seattle to win.
There will be one difference in this game, LB Lance Briggs. He didn't play the first time. He will be comping at the bit for this go around. And it's an experienced trio at linebacker, Briggs, Brian Urlacher and Pino Tinoisamoa is as good a trio you will find.
Where the Bears upgraded, obviously, was bringing in DE Julius Peppers. And as much as you might think that helped the pass rush, it has helped stopping the run. The Bears were only behind the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2010. That's improvement.
The secondary is a bit underrated. They're aren't a lot of names back there, but they can hang with these Seahawks receivers. In fact, I like CB Charles Tillman. Look for Tillman to be manned up against Mike Williams.
Something that's interesting is that Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll said he will punt to Devin Hester. I don't get that. Seattle has a good punter in Jon Ryan. He was one of the top placement punters in the NFL this season. And why put the kind of unnecessary pressure on your coverage teams?
And maybe Carroll is just blowing smoke.
The issue in this game will be can Seattle outscore Chicago. I'm not seeing it, but they did outscore the Saints last week and New Orleans does have a more potent offense that Chicago. But as I said, the Bears can run. If Jay Cutler has 60 pass attempts like Drew Brees did last week, it WILL be a Seahawks victory.
Friday, January 14, 2011
NFC Divisional Battle: Packers/Falcons
The prime time game for tomorrow evening is the Green Bay Packers making a return trip to the Georgia Dome to take on the NFC's #1 seed Atlanta Falcons. In week 12, Atlanta defeated the Packers 20-17. Falcons K Matt Bryant won the game with a 47 yard FG.
The matchup all will want to talk about here is the QBs: Rodgers and Matt Ryan. There is much more than that to this game.
Yes, the Falcons come into this game as the top seed in the NFC. Yes, they have a gifted QB in Ryan. And yes, Ryan's career record at the Georgia Dome is a mind-boggling 20-2. But why do I get the feeling they're being slighted here.
Game Time: 8:00 PM ET
Network: FOX
Announcers: Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Pam Oliver
When the Falcons have the ball...
If you check out the box score from that week 12 meeting, two things jump out at you.
The first is that Ryan only had 197 yards passing with only one TD. FOr the season, Ryan tossed 28 TD with only 9 INT. But I have to ask this: How in the world does Matty Ice only get 197 yards passing? Kind of easy when you have a running back like Michael Turner.
And that's the second thing. Turner rushed for 110 yards and a TD. Turner was 3rd in the NFL in rushing with 1,371 yards. That's the same gameplan in which the Falcons should approach with in this game. Those are both strengths of the Falcons offense. Run the ball and run it some more. When the opposing defense cheats toward the line of scrimmage, hit 'em with a pass. No, the Falcons do possess more than just these two. You don't have to look hard either.
Look out wide an there's WR Roddy White. He led the NFL in receptions with 115. White's 1,389 receiving yards was 2nd behind Denver's Brandon Lloyd. White also hauled in 10 TD passes, too. He can catch long passes or short passes. He will do whatever is asked of him.
Another receiving threat is future Hall of Fame TE Tony Gonzalez. He's Ryan's "go to guy". Whenever a play bogs down, you can bet Ryan will look the way of Gonzalez.
But the Packers don't have your ordinary defense. In fact, it's quite good as in the 5th best in yielding yardage. And they have a couple of playmakers on that side of the ball.
The first is LB Clay Matthews. Some are tabbing Matthews as the Defensive Player of the Year. You must account for him on every down and you have to consistently block him. No small task for any O lineman. Matthews sheds blocks as well as any player in the league. His aggressiveness can be exploited though.
And there's last year's Defensive Player of the Year in Charles Woodson. The fomer Heisman winner has carved himself a nice career as a Packer. He aims to keep that going. Look for Woodson to be up against White in man coverage in critical situations.
If Woodson isn't, the Packers do have to other capable corners in Truman Williams and Sam Shields that do have the speed to stay with White. Williams is as good a #2 CB in the NFL. On some teams, he could be a #1.
When the Packers have the ball...
What more can be said of QB Aaron Rodgers. Yes, I feel he's among the top 5 QBs in the NFL. Lofty praise (not because I said this) and Rodgers deserves every bit he receives. In a season that saw the #1 RB (Ryan Grant) go down in week 1, an up and coming TE go by the wayside a couple weeks later (JerMichael Finley) and still fight off opposing rushers due to an O line that was a bit porous, Rodgers still managed Pro Bowl numbers (
There has been one area that Rodgers has been able to count on week in, week out: his receivers. Greg Jennings, Donald Driver, James Jones and Jordy Nelson all accepted the challenge. While none of these guys produced eye bulging numbers this season, all are capable of turning a short pass into a long play.
Now, there's this rookie out of Buffalo named James Starks that has briefly revitalized the ground game. No one saw his performance from last coming. But Packers head coach Mike McCarthy saw enough in Starks to let him carry the load.
For the past few years, I've always thought of the Falcons defense as a "bend, but don't break" unit. The 2010 season was no different. They didn't allow a lot of points (5th), but they will yield some yards (16th).
The biggest concern will be putting pressure on Rodgers. DE John Abraham may not be 100% for the game and that could create a gap in the D line. It could also afford Rodgers with just that split second longer to throw. And that could spell doom for the Falcons. Kind of hard to replace Abraham's motor AND his 13 sacks.
The lack of a pass rush was put the corners under more pressure as well. Not like the Falcons has a major cause for concern on that front. Dunta Robinson and Brent Grimes are a solid duo that can and will hold their own.
The linebackers are nothing to sneeze at either. There's veteran Mike Peterson to go along with Curtis Lofton and rookie Sean Weatherspoon. Again, solid group, but Peterson's veteran leadership cannot be overlooked here.
This game may boil down to one thing...the return game. The Falcons have just the man in Pro-Bowler Eric Weems.
As I said at the beginning, I feel like the Falcons are receiving no credit for the great season. How do you become the #1 seed yet no one feels like you're supposed to won.
Atlanta is currently a 2.5 point favorite. Usually, the home team gets 3.
See what I mean.
The matchup all will want to talk about here is the QBs: Rodgers and Matt Ryan. There is much more than that to this game.
Yes, the Falcons come into this game as the top seed in the NFC. Yes, they have a gifted QB in Ryan. And yes, Ryan's career record at the Georgia Dome is a mind-boggling 20-2. But why do I get the feeling they're being slighted here.
Game Time: 8:00 PM ET
Network: FOX
Announcers: Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Pam Oliver
When the Falcons have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 25.9 (5th) | 341.1 (16th) | 222.9 (15h) | 118.2 (12th) |
 | 15.0 (2nd) | 309.1 (5th) | 194.2 (5th) | 114.9 (18th) |
If you check out the box score from that week 12 meeting, two things jump out at you.
The first is that Ryan only had 197 yards passing with only one TD. FOr the season, Ryan tossed 28 TD with only 9 INT. But I have to ask this: How in the world does Matty Ice only get 197 yards passing? Kind of easy when you have a running back like Michael Turner.
And that's the second thing. Turner rushed for 110 yards and a TD. Turner was 3rd in the NFL in rushing with 1,371 yards. That's the same gameplan in which the Falcons should approach with in this game. Those are both strengths of the Falcons offense. Run the ball and run it some more. When the opposing defense cheats toward the line of scrimmage, hit 'em with a pass. No, the Falcons do possess more than just these two. You don't have to look hard either.
Look out wide an there's WR Roddy White. He led the NFL in receptions with 115. White's 1,389 receiving yards was 2nd behind Denver's Brandon Lloyd. White also hauled in 10 TD passes, too. He can catch long passes or short passes. He will do whatever is asked of him.
Another receiving threat is future Hall of Fame TE Tony Gonzalez. He's Ryan's "go to guy". Whenever a play bogs down, you can bet Ryan will look the way of Gonzalez.
But the Packers don't have your ordinary defense. In fact, it's quite good as in the 5th best in yielding yardage. And they have a couple of playmakers on that side of the ball.
The first is LB Clay Matthews. Some are tabbing Matthews as the Defensive Player of the Year. You must account for him on every down and you have to consistently block him. No small task for any O lineman. Matthews sheds blocks as well as any player in the league. His aggressiveness can be exploited though.
And there's last year's Defensive Player of the Year in Charles Woodson. The fomer Heisman winner has carved himself a nice career as a Packer. He aims to keep that going. Look for Woodson to be up against White in man coverage in critical situations.
If Woodson isn't, the Packers do have to other capable corners in Truman Williams and Sam Shields that do have the speed to stay with White. Williams is as good a #2 CB in the NFL. On some teams, he could be a #1.
When the Packers have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.2 (10th) | 358.1 (9th) | 257.8 (5th) | 100.4 (24th) |
| 18.0 (5th) | 332.4 (16th) | 226.6 (22nd) | 105.9 (10th) |
What more can be said of QB Aaron Rodgers. Yes, I feel he's among the top 5 QBs in the NFL. Lofty praise (not because I said this) and Rodgers deserves every bit he receives. In a season that saw the #1 RB (Ryan Grant) go down in week 1, an up and coming TE go by the wayside a couple weeks later (JerMichael Finley) and still fight off opposing rushers due to an O line that was a bit porous, Rodgers still managed Pro Bowl numbers (
There has been one area that Rodgers has been able to count on week in, week out: his receivers. Greg Jennings, Donald Driver, James Jones and Jordy Nelson all accepted the challenge. While none of these guys produced eye bulging numbers this season, all are capable of turning a short pass into a long play.
Now, there's this rookie out of Buffalo named James Starks that has briefly revitalized the ground game. No one saw his performance from last coming. But Packers head coach Mike McCarthy saw enough in Starks to let him carry the load.
For the past few years, I've always thought of the Falcons defense as a "bend, but don't break" unit. The 2010 season was no different. They didn't allow a lot of points (5th), but they will yield some yards (16th).
The biggest concern will be putting pressure on Rodgers. DE John Abraham may not be 100% for the game and that could create a gap in the D line. It could also afford Rodgers with just that split second longer to throw. And that could spell doom for the Falcons. Kind of hard to replace Abraham's motor AND his 13 sacks.
The lack of a pass rush was put the corners under more pressure as well. Not like the Falcons has a major cause for concern on that front. Dunta Robinson and Brent Grimes are a solid duo that can and will hold their own.
The linebackers are nothing to sneeze at either. There's veteran Mike Peterson to go along with Curtis Lofton and rookie Sean Weatherspoon. Again, solid group, but Peterson's veteran leadership cannot be overlooked here.
This game may boil down to one thing...the return game. The Falcons have just the man in Pro-Bowler Eric Weems.
As I said at the beginning, I feel like the Falcons are receiving no credit for the great season. How do you become the #1 seed yet no one feels like you're supposed to won.
Atlanta is currently a 2.5 point favorite. Usually, the home team gets 3.
See what I mean.
AFC Divisional Battle: Ravens/Steelers
What a game to kick off the NFL playoff games tomorrow. You have most likely the hardest hitting rivalry in the league with the Baltimore Ravens traveling to Heinz Field to take on the Pittsburgh Steelers.
For the season, the teams split their two affairs. The Ravens won the first game in week 4 at Pittsburgh 17-14. That was the last game of Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger's suspension. The Steelers returned the favor in week 13 by beating the Ravens in Baltimore 13-10. Yes, I expect the same type of games as the first two meetings these two teams had during the regular season.
Game Time: 4:30 PM ET
Network: CBS
Announcers: Greg Gumbel and Dan Dierdorf
Site: Heinz Field, Pittsburgh
The Steelers get the game at home due to winning the AFC North title and being the #2 seed in the AFC. Will that provide enough for Pittsburgh to advance? We'll see.
When the Steelers have the ball...
As I have previously stated, the first time these two teams squared off, Ben Roethlisberger did not play. The Steelers just have a different air about them when he's leading the offense. They seem more confident. They actually are a bit more explosive only because Roethlisberger can take a play that has broken down and achieve positive yardage.
That's created a bit of a change in what was once a primarily rushing team. THey can still pound the ball with Rashard Mendenhall, but now, the Steelers have this ability to throw.
On one side, there's Hines Ward. He's as tested as any receiver in the NFL. For the last couple of seasons, it seems like people want to write him off. All Ward does is go out and compete. Then, you look on the other side and see Mike Wallace.
Wallace had a sensational regular season. He led the Steelers in receptions (60), receiving yards (1,257) , TD receptions (10) and yards per catch (21.0). To say he's a deep threat is an understatement, but Wallace can run with the ball after a catch.
For years, we've heard all the pleasantries about the Ravens defense. And every bit if it is well deserved. The philosophy hasn't changed over the last decade, hit 'em and hit 'em harder. Seems simplistic, but don't be fooled. When your defense can routinely run two certain Hall of Famers out there (Ray Lewis and Ed Reed), you better hope your head is on a swivel. Oh, they have both probably seen every formation this Steelers offense can muster.
If there is one weakness on the Ravens defense, it is defending the pass. Last week against the Chiefs, the Ravens secondary devoured a playoff rookie in Chiefs QB Matt Cassel. Getting pressure on Roethlisberger isn't always a good thing because he is so strong, he can get out of potential sack situations. And there's the added factor of making something out of nothing.
The guy across the line of scrimmage this week is no playoff rookie. He owns a pair of Super Bowl rings. I look for the Steelers to maybe find other ways to utilize Wallace and his speed. Bubble screens and a reverse or two may be just the ting to keep that Ravens D line from over committing.
When the Ravens have the ball...
The Ravens are a running offense. That's the mantra we've been hearing for years. It's true, but the NFL universe is waiting for Joe Flacco to bust out. He performed well aslt week against a decent Kansas City defense. I said decent, not great. That's the task for Flacco this week. Can he duplicate that against the Steelers?
For last week, Flacco posted numbers of 25-34, 265 yards and 2 TD in the Ravens 30-7 stomping of the Chiefs. Considering his last couple of playoff games were anything but good, he did manage to instill a bit of self confidence. Plus, knowing what's across the line will only aid him.
And Flacco may have helped TE Todd Heap rediscover the Fountain of Youth. Heap caught a Ravens playoff record 10 balls for 108 yards. Heap will need a similar performance (I'm guessing about 7 catches for 70-80 yards would be good) for The Ravens to open the field up a bit for RB Ray Rice.
The Ravens offense is practically built around Rice. Rice is emerging as one of the top duel threat backs in the NFL. Last week, he only rushed for 57 yards and only caught five passes. That may be a good thing. He didn't have to absorb as much punishment as he will this week. He'll be a bit fresher, but not much. The Ravens are operating on one less day.
Like Heap came through last week, add WR Anquan Boldin to the list this week. If a Flacco to Boldin connection can be established, that means two things. One is Flacco is getting protection. Two is that Boldin is muscling his way through a pretty darn good secondary. The pass is one are where the Steelers can be had if executed properly.
With the week off, S Troy Polamalu received a much needed rest. That spells bad news for the Ravens. But the Steelers are much more the the long locked one. LB James Harrison is one of the elite defenders in the NFL. He can rush the passer, stop the running game and defend the pass. The Ravens will have to know where #98 is at all times.
And do not underestimate the Steelers D line. While the Ravens D line grabs a fair amount of press because of Haloti Ngata, these guys: Ziggy Hood, Chris Hoke, Casey Hampton, and Brett Keisel, know their roles and the reason the linebackers get all the glory. A thankless job, but these four are more than willing to accept that.
Overall, it's always hard to go against the home team in a playoff game. We saw how that worked out last week as the home team only won one of the four games (Seattle). And the Ravens can win in Pittsburgh...but not this week.
The extra time for the Steelers and one less day for the Ravens has me sold.
For the season, the teams split their two affairs. The Ravens won the first game in week 4 at Pittsburgh 17-14. That was the last game of Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger's suspension. The Steelers returned the favor in week 13 by beating the Ravens in Baltimore 13-10. Yes, I expect the same type of games as the first two meetings these two teams had during the regular season.
Game Time: 4:30 PM ET
Network: CBS
Announcers: Greg Gumbel and Dan Dierdorf
Site: Heinz Field, Pittsburgh
The Steelers get the game at home due to winning the AFC North title and being the #2 seed in the AFC. Will that provide enough for Pittsburgh to advance? We'll see.
When the Steelers have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 23.4 (12th) | 345.3 (14th) | 225.1 (14th) | 120.2 (11th) |
 | 16.9 (3rd) | 318.9 (10th) | 224.9 (21st) | 93.9 (5th) |
As I have previously stated, the first time these two teams squared off, Ben Roethlisberger did not play. The Steelers just have a different air about them when he's leading the offense. They seem more confident. They actually are a bit more explosive only because Roethlisberger can take a play that has broken down and achieve positive yardage.
 |
| Image: Jeffrey Beall/Flickr |
On one side, there's Hines Ward. He's as tested as any receiver in the NFL. For the last couple of seasons, it seems like people want to write him off. All Ward does is go out and compete. Then, you look on the other side and see Mike Wallace.
Wallace had a sensational regular season. He led the Steelers in receptions (60), receiving yards (1,257) , TD receptions (10) and yards per catch (21.0). To say he's a deep threat is an understatement, but Wallace can run with the ball after a catch.
For years, we've heard all the pleasantries about the Ravens defense. And every bit if it is well deserved. The philosophy hasn't changed over the last decade, hit 'em and hit 'em harder. Seems simplistic, but don't be fooled. When your defense can routinely run two certain Hall of Famers out there (Ray Lewis and Ed Reed), you better hope your head is on a swivel. Oh, they have both probably seen every formation this Steelers offense can muster.
If there is one weakness on the Ravens defense, it is defending the pass. Last week against the Chiefs, the Ravens secondary devoured a playoff rookie in Chiefs QB Matt Cassel. Getting pressure on Roethlisberger isn't always a good thing because he is so strong, he can get out of potential sack situations. And there's the added factor of making something out of nothing.
The guy across the line of scrimmage this week is no playoff rookie. He owns a pair of Super Bowl rings. I look for the Steelers to maybe find other ways to utilize Wallace and his speed. Bubble screens and a reverse or two may be just the ting to keep that Ravens D line from over committing.
When the Ravens have the ball...
| Scoring (Rk) | Total Yds (Rk) | Pass Yds (Rk) | Rush Yds (Rk) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.3 (16th) | 322.9 (22nd) | 208.4 (20th) | 114.4 (14th) |
| 14.5 (1st) | 276.8 (2nd) | 214.1 (12th) | 62.8 (1st) |
The Ravens are a running offense. That's the mantra we've been hearing for years. It's true, but the NFL universe is waiting for Joe Flacco to bust out. He performed well aslt week against a decent Kansas City defense. I said decent, not great. That's the task for Flacco this week. Can he duplicate that against the Steelers?
For last week, Flacco posted numbers of 25-34, 265 yards and 2 TD in the Ravens 30-7 stomping of the Chiefs. Considering his last couple of playoff games were anything but good, he did manage to instill a bit of self confidence. Plus, knowing what's across the line will only aid him.
 |
| Image: Keith Allison/Flickr |
The Ravens offense is practically built around Rice. Rice is emerging as one of the top duel threat backs in the NFL. Last week, he only rushed for 57 yards and only caught five passes. That may be a good thing. He didn't have to absorb as much punishment as he will this week. He'll be a bit fresher, but not much. The Ravens are operating on one less day.
Like Heap came through last week, add WR Anquan Boldin to the list this week. If a Flacco to Boldin connection can be established, that means two things. One is Flacco is getting protection. Two is that Boldin is muscling his way through a pretty darn good secondary. The pass is one are where the Steelers can be had if executed properly.
With the week off, S Troy Polamalu received a much needed rest. That spells bad news for the Ravens. But the Steelers are much more the the long locked one. LB James Harrison is one of the elite defenders in the NFL. He can rush the passer, stop the running game and defend the pass. The Ravens will have to know where #98 is at all times.
And do not underestimate the Steelers D line. While the Ravens D line grabs a fair amount of press because of Haloti Ngata, these guys: Ziggy Hood, Chris Hoke, Casey Hampton, and Brett Keisel, know their roles and the reason the linebackers get all the glory. A thankless job, but these four are more than willing to accept that.
Overall, it's always hard to go against the home team in a playoff game. We saw how that worked out last week as the home team only won one of the four games (Seattle). And the Ravens can win in Pittsburgh...but not this week.
The extra time for the Steelers and one less day for the Ravens has me sold.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Cromartie Mirrors Ryan
Go figure this one.
New York Jets cornerback Antonio Cromatie was asked his opinion of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady. Being a Jet, Cromartie's answer wasn't expected to be full of compliments. It was full of something else. Courtesy of the New York Daily News:
So much for exchanging pleasantries, Antonio. I bet there are some on the Patriots that feel the same about Cromartie. Thing is, the Pats aren't as arrogant or mouthy and elect to keep that kind of crap in house. And what makes Cromartie's quote even funnier is that he's only in his first season with the Jets. He's not even close to have been around that block long enough.
Apparently, this all stems from the last time the Jets were at Gillette Stadium and the Pats crushed the Jets by a score of 45-3. During that game, Brady had completed a pass for a touchdown to make it a 38-3 score. It is alledged that Brady pointed over to the Jets sideline. Jets headmouth coach Rex Ryan eluded to that fact earlier this week. Cromartie elaborated on that issue.
You might think that Cromartie just placed an even bigger target on his back. That's not the Belichick and Patriot way. Brady emphasized that point when he was asked about Cromartie's comments. Courtesy of Fanhouse.com:
The problem with that is Ryan and the Jets are all about the publicity. We here all the talk always eminating for there. Rarely anywhere else. That could be because the Jets make their home in the #1 media market in the nation.
Need more be said.
New York Jets cornerback Antonio Cromatie was asked his opinion of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady. Being a Jet, Cromartie's answer wasn't expected to be full of compliments. It was full of something else. Courtesy of the New York Daily News:
"An ass----...---- him."Oh. He also hates Brady.
So much for exchanging pleasantries, Antonio. I bet there are some on the Patriots that feel the same about Cromartie. Thing is, the Pats aren't as arrogant or mouthy and elect to keep that kind of crap in house. And what makes Cromartie's quote even funnier is that he's only in his first season with the Jets. He's not even close to have been around that block long enough.
Apparently, this all stems from the last time the Jets were at Gillette Stadium and the Pats crushed the Jets by a score of 45-3. During that game, Brady had completed a pass for a touchdown to make it a 38-3 score. It is alledged that Brady pointed over to the Jets sideline. Jets head
"We see that a lot. He does it a lot," Cromartie said. "That's the kind of guy he is. We really don't give a damn, to tell you the truth."Question for Cromartie. If you "don't give a damn", why even bother to address the issue?
You might think that Cromartie just placed an even bigger target on his back. That's not the Belichick and Patriot way. Brady emphasized that point when he was asked about Cromartie's comments. Courtesy of Fanhouse.com:
"We're spending our time getting ready to play," he [Brady] responded. "I don't think we're spending our time figuring out what we can do to combat what people may say about us. Not everybody has great things to say about our team or organization, or certain players. That's kind of the way it's always been. We're just going to do our talking on the field. That's the way we've always chosen to do."And that's the way it should be. Determine it on the field, not in the media.
The problem with that is Ryan and the Jets are all about the publicity. We here all the talk always eminating for there. Rarely anywhere else. That could be because the Jets make their home in the #1 media market in the nation.
Need more be said.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Ryan Mouthing Off Again
 |
| Image by cool13902008 via Flickr |
First, not everyone has it in for you, although there may be a growing group that could be building. Second, shut up! Seriously, Rex. Shut the hell up.
In case you're not sure what I'm referring to, New York Jets head coach Rex Ryan continues to run his mouth, and, unfortunately, the only thing that may stop it is a Jets loss. Wait. That probably won't do it either.
What planet is this dude from? Well, Planet Ryan is once again claiming that when it comes to his next opponent, this time New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick, "it's personal". Ryan:
"This is about Bill Belichick vs. Rex Ryan," the Jets' brash coach declared Monday. "There's no question. It's personal. It's about him against myself, and that's what it's going to come down to."Well, for those that feel Ryan can say anything he wants, you're right. It's called free speech, a basic fundamental this great nation was founded upon. But to say he's earned the right to say anything he wants, Constitutionally, yes. Realistically, no.
Call me "old school" if you wish, but I am of the school of thought that you have to accomplish something before you start popping off at the mouth. What has Ryan earned? Where has he earned it? Makes good TV, but where are you're freakin' rings, Rex? Do you own one as a head coach? Nope...and Belichick has more than one ring. If he were to say anything like this, he was surprise us all, but he's earned that "right".
 |
| Image by steveglass via Flickr |
And your "it's personal" line, already tired and worn out. And why taking all the verbal jousts at your opponent. Especially the Patriots. If there's a team that will not fall for his sideshow antics, it's Belichick and the Pats. They know what he's all about. Give the guy a mic and a camera...
But Belichick took an un-Belichick-like jab of his own toward Ryan. From CBSSports.com:
"I might have a little quickness on him," an uncharacteristically playful Belichick said. "He's probably got a little more strength and power on me. So, I don't think you'll see either one of us out there making any blocks or tackles or runs or throws or catches. At least you won't see me doing it. It's probably a good thing for our team."And just like that, Belichick brings it all back under control. I wouldn't expect another word about this from Belichick. He knows the task at hand, beat the Jets for a second time this season.
And like Belichick said, the coaches aren't wearing uniforms. Don't even get me going with the possible sight of Ryan in one.
That's the difference between the two coaches. Belichick doesn't involve all the bells and whistles like Ryan employs. That doesn't fit Belichick's make up while Ryan will never shy away from a chance to talk.
Is it me or could Belichick be the more popular of the two coaches (toward the good) in this game?
Seahawks Still Receiving No Respect
I was waiting for this to happen. Waiting for at least one person to slam my Seattle Seahawks
and their dismal 7-9 regular season showing and how they didn't belong in the NFL playoffs, let alone host a playoff game. Bear with me here as my judgment may become a tad clouded. I am a huge Seahawks fan...and yes, I am still celebrating this win.
But as I said, here we are. We all know the Seahawks got the last laugh (kind of) against the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints
. And along comes Business Insider Sports Page stating that the Seahawks win displays why the NFL playoff system needs a re-tooling and offers a solution...
If you're wanting to "rid" those teams from hosting a game, how about they must hold a 9-7 record. That's a winning record, not 8-8.
To some extent, making the playoffs is based on record. I cannot understand (and I am not looking at this through rose-colored glasses) how people are screaming for all this change. As I said a couple days ago, this is the first time this has happened. It's the old "the sky is falling" thing, huh?
Wait. I do understand why all these negative vibes are flowing.
Your team got cheated, or so you think. I can thoroughly understand if fans of the New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers are a bit bitter. They did post better records and are sitting at home. The Giants lost at Green Bay in week 16 and that pretty much sealed their fate.
The Bucs were the real unfortunate ones. They're in the same division as the Saints and #1 seed Atlanta Falcons. While we have seen three teams from one division make the "tournament", it's not a frequent occurrence. The Bucs had to have both the Giants and Green Bay Packers lose and the they had to best the Saints (which they did) to make the postseason parade.
And here's another thing. Are people upset because last season's "feel good story" is no more? That's part of it. The Saints were the darlings of the NFL last year. Every time you turned on your TV after their Super Bowl win, you got nothing but a screenful of Drew Brees. You tuned your radio to any sports talk station and the Saints were one of the first topics that were discussed.
That's almost all gone now. The only thing left is for people, Saints fans or not, to howl of the unfairness of the situation.
I can dispel that all right now.
Of all the home teams from this past weekend, only one home team won. One. Not Philadelphia. Not Kansas City. Not Indianapolis. Seattle.
And ponder this thought as scary as it may sound. If the Packers beat the Falcons and the Seahawks beat the Bears, guess where the NFC Championship game will be held?
Qwest Field.
Now wouldn't that turn the world upside down.
and their dismal 7-9 regular season showing and how they didn't belong in the NFL playoffs, let alone host a playoff game. Bear with me here as my judgment may become a tad clouded. I am a huge Seahawks fan...and yes, I am still celebrating this win.But as I said, here we are. We all know the Seahawks got the last laugh (kind of) against the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints
. And along comes Business Insider Sports Page stating that the Seahawks win displays why the NFL playoff system needs a re-tooling and offers a solution...The solution? Give each division an automatic playoff berth, but if a division winner finishes under .500, it should be forced to play its Wild Card game on the road.That's your solution? If a team doesn't have at least a .500 record, you cannot host a game? Oh, but if you're 8-8, that's okay? News flash here. 8-8 is also a non-winning record. It's not a losing record, bit it's not a winning record either. That's also mediocrity which is, I suppose, the aim of this crack headed idea.
If you're wanting to "rid" those teams from hosting a game, how about they must hold a 9-7 record. That's a winning record, not 8-8.
To some extent, making the playoffs is based on record. I cannot understand (and I am not looking at this through rose-colored glasses) how people are screaming for all this change. As I said a couple days ago, this is the first time this has happened. It's the old "the sky is falling" thing, huh?
Wait. I do understand why all these negative vibes are flowing.
Your team got cheated, or so you think. I can thoroughly understand if fans of the New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers are a bit bitter. They did post better records and are sitting at home. The Giants lost at Green Bay in week 16 and that pretty much sealed their fate.
The Bucs were the real unfortunate ones. They're in the same division as the Saints and #1 seed Atlanta Falcons. While we have seen three teams from one division make the "tournament", it's not a frequent occurrence. The Bucs had to have both the Giants and Green Bay Packers lose and the they had to best the Saints (which they did) to make the postseason parade.
And here's another thing. Are people upset because last season's "feel good story" is no more? That's part of it. The Saints were the darlings of the NFL last year. Every time you turned on your TV after their Super Bowl win, you got nothing but a screenful of Drew Brees. You tuned your radio to any sports talk station and the Saints were one of the first topics that were discussed.
That's almost all gone now. The only thing left is for people, Saints fans or not, to howl of the unfairness of the situation.
I can dispel that all right now.
 |
| Qwest Field. Site of NFC Championship? Image: Yincrash via Wikimedia Commons |
And ponder this thought as scary as it may sound. If the Packers beat the Falcons and the Seahawks beat the Bears, guess where the NFC Championship game will be held?
Qwest Field.
Now wouldn't that turn the world upside down.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)